Bred for battleunderstanding ancient spartas military machine. Assume it is a french knight near the end of the hundred years war, and the spartan is from near spartas peak. The greek style of warfare was as superior to the aztec method as the roman method was to the gauls. Inspired by the mascot fight thread, who would win between a knight and spartan. But the roman empire was vast, far larger than any medieval state. Rome the biggest empire at the time, its military was 2nd to non but defeated sparta when the city state was at its weakest. What if the two would go into battle against each other. Assuming flat terrain, only the classic spartan hoplite and the roman legionary.
Spartan has better soldiers, but rome has better armies. Romans would win they had superior weaponry and armor they had better battle tactics and gave no mercy. Who would win in a war, the spartans or the romans answers. After all, the roman legionary was able to defeat the macedonian phalanx. Sparta and athens had a lot in common when it comes to the civic organisation, the. Spartans vs roman legionnaire conclusion and follow up. The spartans trained and killed each other from age seven. You could take any modern day special forces unit and have them face a decently trained regular infantry unit that uses. Picture of spartas theater, built by the romans in 30.
The romans and the achaeans were joined outside the city by the pergamese and rhodian fleets. Sparta and athens had a lot in common when it comes to the civic organisation, the structure. Im confident that roman legion can beat spartan army in equal number at a large scale battle. Especially if it they fought in groups, then it would be the hoplites hands down, but even one on one, the spartan hoplite form birth to death did nothing but train to fight. In an arena fight with a spartan with a spear and a samurai with a katana, the spartan would win. The roman army of the 2nd century bc was very different to that of the 4th ad, just as the armies of the 10th century differed greatly from those of the 15th. In any, single battle, assuming the aztecs didnt have a monstrous numerical superiority, the spartans would win handsdown. The romans then won another battle against the spartans and forced them to retreat into the city. I recreated a scenario of the traditional spartan phalanx about 5th century bc fighting against a cohortal roman legion 1st century ad. Roman legionairres vs greek spartans, who would win. But who would win in a battle between a roman legion and a greek phalanx.
Who would win a spartan soldier or a knight answers. The roman is using technology more advanced than the spartan. Upon spotting the small group of roman soldiers, a group of spartan troops sallied forth from the gates and skirmished with the romans about 300 paces from the city walls. Roman legionaries, because they are more maneuverable. Roman empire will probably win around 95% of the time. But there is much more to spartan history than the 300.
Answer 2 they did defeat the spartans aka the achean war actually a spartan would win because his training was to make him invunrable to almost anything. Sparta was the most feared city state in the known world to the point even alexander refused to attempt to conquer them. Clash of the deadly rivals at the height of its power, rome not only accomplished great. As the port of gythium was an important spartan base, the allies decided to capture it before they advanced inland to sparta. So 1 standard roman army vs 1 standard spartan army both at their peak fight. Suppose an ancient spartan and a modern navy seal were to clash in h2h combat, who would win. By the time rome came into power, sparta was pretty much gone. These two forces were the best soldiers of the ancient world, but which is truly the better.
However, the roman empire had a half of a millenia to advance their technology, and had the manipular legion, specifically designed to counter the phalanx. Each side is equipped with their standard weaponry. Some coastal cities surrendered to the romans which allowed them to have a base in the coastal regions of laconia. Who do you think would win between a formation that uses the techniques designed by.
So by a small amount the roman soldier should defeat a spartan warrior in the field of battle. They have thick armor, triplex shields, and each two javelins that can penetrate armor. The spartans would have an easy job of the romans even with slightly superior weaponry in terms of rome vs sparta however sparta would eventually be defeated by superior number and superior techonology such as siege weapons but man to man i would bet on a spartan against any other soldier in history. So the ninja can win the spartan by hitting running and hiding and hitting. The romans aka the roman legion of the roman republic about 100 years precesarpre roman empire fought the spartans at the battle of gythium in 195 bc. Roman republic will have a tough fight on their hands due to even numbers, spartans win 6070% of the time. They may be physically less strong, but the spartans equipment and tactics are outdated compared to the roman ones. Rome at its peak vs sparta at its peak total war forums. Who would win in a fight a spartan or a ninja answers. Who would win a fight gladiators or spartans answers. The spartans were some of the greatest soldiers of all time, but that isnt as great an advantage as people make it out to be. If your talking about one spartan vs one legionaire in a sword fight the spartan would win. The roman legionairs would, power through discipline and unity. That being said, the romans would concentrate their efforsts to fight in eneven field from the beginning.
Now, with modern science and technology deadalivemaniac, zivon96, mkdemigodzwarrior, pfc rice man and metal harbinger bring these legends back to life to compete and find out who is. If it was a fight of two similar roman and spartan armies in a uneven field, than probably the romans would win most of the times, as then the greek phalanx would malfunction in comparison to the romans. The spartans held out, but one of the joint commanders, dexagoridas, decided to surrender the city to the roman legate. A veteran roman legionnaire or an elite spartan warrior. Titanfall pilot versus a halo spartan, master of mobility versus the titanium tank. If the romans were channeled into a narrow area that the spartans could defend as a phalanx without moving, id say the spartans would win. This is your average spartan warrior the historical. For most of the roman imperial period, the legions formed the roman armys elite heavy infantry, recruited exclusively from roman citizens, while the remainder of the army consisted of auxiliaries.
I find it difficult to believe that three people actually voted for the aztecs. In ninjas vs spartan i say ninjas are sift and light in weight were as the spartan is not swift and has lots of weight. This is your average spartan warrior the historical kind, not from 300 and your average navy seal. The history of sparta describes the destiny of the ancient dorian greek state known as sparta from its beginning in the legendary period to its incorporation into the achaean league under the late roman republic. Was the spartan agoge education system still in use at the time of the roman invasion of greece. The romans forced the spartans to retreat back into the city. Lets say romans vs spartans fight close combat 100 times in an open field. The spartan army stood at the centre of the spartan state, whose citizens were trained in the discipline and honor of the warrior. Spartan armour consisted of a breastplate, helmet, and greaves, as well as a large shield.
The romans lost the battle of heraclea in 280 bc against a kinsman of alexander the great the very man who came up with the idea of a phalanx in the first place. In order to reach a definite conclusion as to who would win in a battle between a greek phalanx and the roman legion, lets look at some reallife historical examples. Who would win the majority in a series of 1v1 duels. So 1 standard roman army vs 1 standard spartan army both at their peak fight, who do you think would win. Top 10 ancient rome inventions that are still used today. The roman soldiers usually entered the army in there early to late teens. Viking warrior vs spartan warrior in a deadliest warrior. Just wanted to see if there was anything i didnt know about spartans that could of changed the tide.
Flamininus moved his camp to the position where the skirmish had occurred. I think that a knight would win after a good fight because of his equipment. The spartans martial art called pankration all powers was more deadly both with armor and without a spartan could kill a fully armed opponent with nothing but his bare hands. Mostly, they would just be able to outflank the spartans. The spartans are well trained and armed the romans were one or two generations ahead of the spartans. Look what happened it is right there in the history books. If this phrase is to be taken literally, it would mean that the war occurred around the end of the 8th century. Their weapons were a 9 foot long spear, and a short sword. Spartan elite, but as soon as i get the game im going to make a big free for all with roman elites, berserkers, spartans, and other elite units. Who would win in a war, the spartans or the romans. Roman empire was truly the worlds first superpower while sparta was merely a regional power though one that earned respect and admiration in its time. Throughout history there have been many warriors who left their mark on their respective cultures. The spartan army stood at the centre of the spartan state, whose citizens were trained in. Not to mention that they carried spears compared to a centurion that only carried a short sword.